This charge is codified under N.J.S.A. 39:3-40. DWI and driving while revoked go together like New Jersey and traffic tickets. In many cases the DWI driver will also be suspended as a result of a prior conviction for a DWI offense. More often the DWI driver will be on the revoked list because he failed to pay drunk driving surcharges to the MVC. A driving while revoked charge based on a DWI suspension is very difficult to resolve.
There are literally thousands of driving while suspended violations issued every year. Each and every year the laws of New Jersey recognize new grounds to suspend or revoke a person’s driver’s license. A driver can be suspended or revoked for many grounds. The major grounds for suspension are as follows:
Nonetheless, most drivers still drive even if their license is revoked or suspended. New Jersey does not have any temporary, provisional or “work” license which permits the driver to lawfully operate a motor vehicle during certain hours of the day, or for the purpose of traveling to work. Many other states have temporary driver’s licenses, even if the driver is suspended for a DWI charge. However, New Jersey does not issue any temporary or conditional driver’s licenses, and in my opinion they never will.
A suspended driver can’t drive at all for any reason! A suspended driver can’t drive to and from work or school. A suspended driver can’t drive to the supermarket to purchase food for the family. He can’t drive to obtain medical care. Even in a remote area where there is no public transportation a suspended driver may not lawfully drive, even if he is faced with a life-threatening emergency.
In my opinion, most Municipal Courts are fairly reasonable when it deals with persons who are charged with driving while suspended. However, if a person is driving while suspended because of DWI charge, then this is a special case and the courts will want to “roast” the defendant.
In order to prove that a driver is guilty of driving on the revoked list the prosecutor must prove two essential elements. First, the prosecutor must prove that the driver actually operated the vehicle. Second, the prosecutor must prove that the driver operated the vehicle when his or her driving privileges were suspended.
In my experience, many times the prosecutor is overwhelmed, and he or she often does not have the necessary proofs to convict the defendant. The prosecutor has to obtain the suspension papers and the proof of mailings from the MVC. Many times the prosecutor fails to obtain these items of discovery. If this scenario occurs, then this is a perfect opportunity to pursue a downgrade to the charge of an unlicensed driver. The prosecutor may object and then ask for an adjournment. However, stand your ground and inform the judge that you want to have a speedy trial. This type of objection and legal maneuvering in some courts may convince the prosecutor to offer you the unlicensed driver charge.
Sometimes a driver can also contest the “operation” prong of the driving while revoked statute. In many cases the police officer fails to appear for court. If the police officer fails to appear for court then the prosecutor can’t prove that the driver operated the vehicle. Thus, the case will be dismissed. In summary, the more thoroughly a driver understands and protects their rights then this will only increase their chances of obtaining a better deal at Municipal Court.
A driver can also try to contest the second prong of the driving while revoked statute as well. The best avenue for a driver to argue is that their underlying suspension is invalid. A driver can also argue to the Municipal Court that he never received any type of notice or a hearing to contest his license suspension.
The most common practice is for a driver to adjourn their case, and then undertake any and all efforts to restore his driving privileges. In most cases the driver can go to the MVC and pay their back surcharges. In other cases a driver can pay any outstanding traffic tickets or parking tickets. The driver must obtain “paper proof” that they have satisfied any outstanding traffic tickets, parking violations, or surcharges.
At court the driver must provide these items to the prosecutor. In most cases the prosecutor will then downgrade the case to an unlicensed driver charge if he is only a first time violator. In summary, the key objective in any driving while revoked or suspended case is to address the suspension, and to pay any outstanding charges to restore the license.
In the field of municipal court practice it is not uncommon at all for clients to have multiple “prior” convictions for the offense of driving while revoked. Once a driver obtains three convictions then there is mandatory jail time or slap time. I have represented a client who has been convicted of 23 driving while suspended charges.
A first offender is subject to a punishment that includes both fines, and a loss of their driving privileges. There is a fine of $500. A driver can also lose their license for up to six months. However, in most cases the court does not suspend any license for a first time offender.
A second offender is subject to an increased punishment. A second offender must pay a fine of $750. Moreover, a driver is also subject to an additional license suspension for as long as six months. Most judges only impose a 30 days driving suspension for a second offense.
In addition to the heavy fines a jail term must also be part of the sentence imposed on a second offense. The length of the jail term is between one and five days. In most cases the judges allow the drivers serve their “time” by coming to the court to waste their day(s) by sitting there. A driver will receive a day of jail credit for every court session that he appears at. In my experience some of the drivers still fail to serve their sentence by going to the court to sit there. Many drivers are just too irresponsible!
Most judges hate to send drivers to jail for driving while suspended. However, if the driver is a persistent violator then the court will have no choice. Moreover, most counties have some type of SLAP program that will permit the driver to perform some type of community service. However, this certainly is a major inconvenience. Most counties now charge the drivers a daily fee for costs to supervise their slap program. Therefore, the driver is basically paying the county to supervise them while they perform their community service. In my opinion this is an outrage. Nonetheless, the New Jersey government is doing everything in their power to squeeze every dollar out of their bad drivers.
A third or a subsequent offender is subject to a very harsh punishment. A third time offender must pay a fine of $1,000. The driver is also subject to a license suspension for as long as six months. Although there is no minimum period of suspension for this level offender, in most cases a third or more times offender will receive a substantial period of suspension.
The minimum fine is $1,005. A jail term must be part of the sentence on a third time offender. The typical length of the sentence is 10 days. In most cases, the driver can serve his sentence by enrolling in the county SLAP program. Enrolling in a SLAP program is better than serving time in jail. However, the bad driver still must miss work. SLAP ruins all of your weekends. Moreover, it is embarrassing. Many times a SLAP program will make you pick up garbage in your local town while you are wearing bright orange vest. This can be very embarrassing if your friends and co-workers should happen to see you.
A driver who is charged with driving on the revoked list, and who is also on the revoked list for the nonpayment of a parking ticket pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:4-139.10, can present proof to the prosecutor or to the court that he or she has paid the old tickets.
If the driver can provide such proof, then the fines are only a maximum of $102. Basically, the driver can plead guilty to a driving while suspended charge because of the unpaid parking tickets. The prosecutor will then try to sell this deal to the drivers. However, a driver still will receive surcharges of $250 per year for three years. Moreover, the driver will be assessed 9 insurance points.
The best approach is to try to get the charge dropped to an unlicensed driver violation. This result will allow the driver to avoid any insurance surcharges and insurance points.
The driving on the revoked list statute provides a mandatory term of jail for those person’s whose driving has resulted in an accident involving a personal injury to another person. Such a driver must be sentenced to a minimum jail sentence of 45 days. The triggering event for this sentencing enhancement is that there must be a personal injury to another person in a motor vehicle accident. It does not even matter if the other driver was at fault in the accident. If a person is driving on the suspended list, and if there is in an accident, then he must serve a 45-day jail term. In this type of situation a person must find a top notch municipal court lawyer to assist them.
There are many ways to circumvent the draconian nature of this penalty. A 45-day jail term can really ruin a person’s life and also cause him to lose his job. The bottom line is to not drive while suspended. New laws are being enacted each and every year to combat these persistent violators. If you are in an accident and if you are suspended, then you must retain my office or a competent traffic court lawyer. If you “wing it” then you may soon find yourself watching a real lot of TV in the County Jail, and drinking a bunch of disgusting “bug juice” to wash down your prison meals.
A person who drives while on the revoked list will be subject to an increased sentence if the suspension is based on a DWI charge. The person will lose his driver’s license for a period of an additional period of one to two years. This additional suspension will start once the DWI suspension is finished. Finally, a driver under this sentencing enhancement also must be sent to jail. The jail term ranges from a 10 to 90 days in jail.
Many people routinely drive even while they are suspended. Many police officers have advised me that one out of four of the drivers that they pull over on routine traffic stops are on the revoked list. The numbers are even higher in some of the more disadvantaged areas of New Jersey. The privilege of driving is very expensive and many people just can’t afford it. The drivers hope that they can beat the system. Some drivers are just desperate and they have to get to work no matter what the risks are. However, big brother is getting better all the time at busting drivers who are suspended. In some of the poorer areas of New Jersey one out of every four drivers is on the suspended list. Therefore, it is really a number’s game. The more drivers that the police can stop, then the greater the odds that they will arrest more drivers for driving while suspended, registration charges, or for no-insurance violations.
Unfortunately many drivers get caught in the point trap or the insurance surcharge trap, and they live their life in a perpetual status of “driving while suspended.” Being on the suspended list really becomes a way of life for many of our fellow New Jersey citizens.
In my many years of practice, my record is representing a driver with 23 driving while suspended charges. However, there are drivers out there who have had more convictions for driving while suspended.
The State has enacted a new law that increases the jail term for a driving while suspended term by ten days for every violation after the third. Basically, a driver will only go to jail for a third time violation of driving while suspended. A driver who is convicted or who enters a plea for a third time driving while suspended must receive a mandatory ten day jail term.
The Legislature has provided additional sanctions for persons who repeatedly operate a motor vehicle while their driving privileges are suspended or revoked. In the event a driver is convicted of driving on the revoked list for a second or subsequent offense on or after June 24, 2002, then the municipal court must increase the length of the term of mandatory incarceration under certain circumstances. N.J.S.A. 39:3-40(j).
The increase is only triggered when the driver is also found guilty of a moving violation that was committed while he or she was driving on the revoked list. For purposes of this sentence enhancement, a moving violation means any violation of the State’s motor vehicle laws for which points are assessed by the MVC. Accordingly, if a companion moving violation can be dismissed as part of a plea agreement or downgraded to a non-point violation then no additional jail term can be imposed.
In summary, the sentences for repeat and serial driving while suspended cases are getting tougher each and every year. There are several ways around these harsh sentences. However, if you are a serial violator it is advisable to retain an experienced traffic court lawyer. N.J.S.A. 39:3-40(j) provides the court with the discretion to add ten additional days of prison for every violation after the third conviction. Moreover, the statute is written in a mandatory fashion. Therefore, the court is not given wide discretion in their sentencing authority.
A driver can also face a nasty trap if he is busted for driving while suspended for failing to pay his MVC surcharges. The MVC is also authorized to impose surcharges on a person for bad driving. If a driver fails to pay their surcharges, fails to comply with an installment plan or defaults in making any payments, then the MVC is authorized to suspend indefinitely a person’s driver’s license. A driver who operates their motor vehicle when their license is suspended by the MVC. for failing to pay surcharges, is subject to an increased punishment as per N.J.S.A. 39:3-40(g).
The basic theme of this penalty is that there is an additional “MEGA” surcharge of $3,000 imposed if a driver is busted for driving while suspended for not paying his surcharges. The local Municipal Court plays no role in imposing this additional $3,000 surcharge.
The good news is that in most of the cases this additional penalty can be avoided. In most cases the courts will adjourn the case, and give the driver additional time to pay up their back surcharges. Moreover, the driver can make a payment plan with the MVC to pay their back surcharges. If the driver gets paper proof that he has paid the back surcharges, then in most cases the courts will downgrade the case to an unlicensed driver charge.
Every person who is convicted of driving while suspended will also be subject to harsh collateral consequences. These consequences will continue to affect the defendant and his or her ability to lawfully drive for years. They will also dramatically affect the price he or she will have to pay for their liability insurance coverage.
If a driver is convicted of driving while suspended then he will be assessed a surcharge of $250 per year for three years. The surcharge bill will usually be sent to the driver within a few weeks of the conviction, and it must be paid, even if the person’s driving privileges remain suspended.
The insurance companies doing business in New Jersey are entitled to assess insurance eligibility points based on incidents of driving misconduct against the records of their clients in order to rate their policies. An accumulation of nine points or more will usually disqualify the insurance from purchasing auto insurance. A conviction for operating a motor vehicle while on the revoked list carries with an assessment of nine insurance eligibly points. These points remain on the defendant’s insurance record for three years.
At the conclusion of the defendant’s period of suspension, then he or she will be required to pay a restoration fee to the Director of the Motor Vehicle Commission in order to become re-licensed. The fee is $200 and it will be billed to the driver within a few weeks after the conviction.
The entry of a conviction for driving while suspended will remain on the person’s driving abstract and driving record as a permanent entry on his driving record as maintained by MVC. This action can be disastrous for drivers who have C.D.L. licenses or who are truckers. Many truckers simply will not be able to obtain employment if they have a prior driving while suspended conviction on their record. There is no method to expunge a prior conviction for driving while suspended either.
Finally, the act of driving while on the revoked list will be punished on an administrative based by the MVC when there is evidence when the person drove while he or she was suspended. The MVC computer is programmed in such a way as to check the driving status of each licensed driver every time a transaction is recorded on the driver’s record. Thus, if the MVC receives a transmittal from a Municipal Court that a licensed driver was convicted of speeding, careless driving or any other moving violation, then the MVC computer will also check to see if the defendant’s driving privileges were suspended or revoked on that date.
Thereafter, once the driver is busted, then the MVC will send another notice to him or her advising them of new additional driving while revoked charges. The notice issued by the MVC will include a proposed suspension of the person’s driving license for 180 days. The MVC will also impose a surcharge on the driver for $250 for three years. A driver who is faced with this charge can fight the case by requesting a MVC hearing.
There are always new sentences that are constantly being imposed for driving while suspended. N.J.S.A. 39:3-40 provides an increasing range of penalties for people who have been convicted for driving while suspended. Beyond the basic penalties, the law also provided for extra, additional penalties, depending upon the reason for the suspension. Typically, if the reason the defendant defendant has been placed on the revoked list is from a DWI or a refusal suspension, a suspension for driving without liability insurance or not paying surcharges to the MVC, then the sentencing judge must impose a serious of additional sanctions over and above the basic penalties. Thus, a defendant receives double punishment: one set of penalties based upon the reason for the underlying license suspension.
A defendant who drives while on the revoked list will be subject to sentencing enhancements if the reason for the underlying suspension is for driving without insurance. First- time offenders are subject to a one-year suspension. Second- time offenders will lose their license for a two-year period. The sentencing enhancements for such a defendant are in addition to the basic penalties for driving on the revoked list. Thu,s in addition to the required basic penalties, a defendant will also receive a second fine of $500, $33 court costs, and a $6 surcharge. The defendant could also lose his license for a period ranging from one to two years. Finally, the defendant could also be sentenced to jail for as along as 90 days.
A defendant who drives while on the revoked list will be subject to sentencing enhancements if the reason for the underlying suspension is for either drunk driving or for refusal. The enhancement will apply regardless of whether the defendant’s drunk driving conviction occurred in New Jersey or another state. The same enhancements are also required for a defendant who personally operates a motor vehicle after having been suspended by the MVC for being a habitual offender. If a defendant personally operates a motor vehicle during these suspension periods, he or she will be subject to an enhanced punishment under N.J.S.A. 39:3-40(f)(2).
The sentencing enhancements for such a defendant are in addition to the basic penalties for driving on the revoked list. Thus, in addition to the required basic penalties, such a defendant will receive a second fine of $500, $33, and a $6 surcharge. Beyond the basic driver’s license loss required under the basic penalties, the defendant will also be subject to an additional loss of driving privileges that will range from one to two years. This cumulative suspension will commence after the termination of any period of license loss the defendant is serving at the time of the sentence. Finally, a defendant under this sentencing enhancement must be incarcerated for an additional term beyond the basic penalties for a term ranging from 10 to 90 days.
Finally, please note that if the defendant operates his motor vehicle within a school zone while under suspension for DWI, he will be subject to a third set of additional penalties.
A defendant who has been convicted of a school zone violation will be subject to triple punishment. Such a defendant must receive the basic penalties under N.J.S.A. 39:3-40 as well as the additional enhancements under N.J.S.A. 39:3-40 and N.J.S.A. 39:3-40(f)(3). Technically, the only limitation on these sanctions will be in the jail term which may not exceed 180 days in the absence of the offer of a jury trial.